Has anyone ever undertaken an effort to quantify, within a narrow range, and at the level of the average individual, the minimum level of exposure to chemicals and additives that definitively causes harm, in terms of chronic illness, to a significant percent of us? Maybe that would provide greater incentive for lots more people to decide on their own to reduce their exposure and purchase as few products, as reasonably possible, containing those chemicals and additives.
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but aluminum cans and bottles generally feature a thin plastic membrane which is what actually contacts its contents. From a food contamination perspective it's a plastic bag which just happens to be inside an aluminum shell for structural support.
The only safe materials for storing beverages are glass or reusable stainless steel vessels.
The best way would be to build plastic burning power plants. The emission can be cleaned for particles, and co2 is only beneficial for plant life. Too bad the environmental movement, bureaucrats and politicians have all become retarded (perhaps of over exposure of chemicals), believing in a climate crisis caused by co2. This brainwashed belief makes them make all kinds of mistakes concerning health and environment.
Some say the roman’s leadership was driven insane from the lead pipes they used. The average peasant in the countryside or the slums was shielded from this of course as they couldn’t afford such modern amenities.
One wonders how much crazier our fellow lab rats are going to get as this time there is nowhere to hide from the chemical bath.
Has anyone ever undertaken an effort to quantify, within a narrow range, and at the level of the average individual, the minimum level of exposure to chemicals and additives that definitively causes harm, in terms of chronic illness, to a significant percent of us? Maybe that would provide greater incentive for lots more people to decide on their own to reduce their exposure and purchase as few products, as reasonably possible, containing those chemicals and additives.
To the extent we use electricity to extract hydrogen, the resulting oxygen should be used for complete burning of plastic, rubber, etc.
REN, I wonder what you think about flavored water in aluminum cans as an alternative to plastic water bottles, because they're everywhere now.
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but aluminum cans and bottles generally feature a thin plastic membrane which is what actually contacts its contents. From a food contamination perspective it's a plastic bag which just happens to be inside an aluminum shell for structural support.
The only safe materials for storing beverages are glass or reusable stainless steel vessels.
The best way would be to build plastic burning power plants. The emission can be cleaned for particles, and co2 is only beneficial for plant life. Too bad the environmental movement, bureaucrats and politicians have all become retarded (perhaps of over exposure of chemicals), believing in a climate crisis caused by co2. This brainwashed belief makes them make all kinds of mistakes concerning health and environment.
Some say the roman’s leadership was driven insane from the lead pipes they used. The average peasant in the countryside or the slums was shielded from this of course as they couldn’t afford such modern amenities.
One wonders how much crazier our fellow lab rats are going to get as this time there is nowhere to hide from the chemical bath.